Day 21: still muddling on

Posted by David on May 21st, 2007

I’m on page 567 of 776, so if I stop here for the night I’m still on track for the ~25pg/day schedule to finish by the end of the month. Here are some assorted thoughts:

The word “preterite” is used a lot. As noted by another reader, this word is used in Calvinist sense of humanity being divided among the Elect and the Preterite, though Pynchon more often uses it to refer to a kind of existential segregation: without heaven or hell coming into it, Slothrop and other characters are lost in life, free from or unsure of boundaries of allegiance or morality, and this puts them into a sort of hopeless state, muddling through one catastrophe to the next, damned because they were never meant to be saved and unable to find hope because of it. Pynchon also throws in a twist by showing us glimpses of Slothrop’s ancestors, Preterite in the Calvinist sense, either for emphasis or just to add to the confusion of this particular line of symbology.

“Moire” is also used with noticeable frequency. Pynchon will just toss the word in here and there, but I think at one point he did make explicit the use of the term to relate to the interference pattern of intersecting personalities. I suppose that Slothrop now being again in Tchitcherine’s clothes should be notable within this idea.

I haven’t been looking up any of the foreign words as I go through. I find I get the feel for a chapter better without the breaks, and I think that, falling back again to that other experience, V. left me jaded as to this habit’s effectiveness. I miss an important symbol here and there, but the Internet didn’t know a damn thing about Maltese. I think I’m able to pick up most of the German that matters, I think, and Pynchon was kind enough to spell out the connection between the Schwarzkommando and the S-Gerat.

I do wonder how much of this book is flying completely over my head without me even suspecting it. In V., Vheissu tied into the idea of a hollow earth, a new world underground with its entrances at the poles. The only reason I noticed that at all is because I had just read a Rotten Library article on the topic. Pynchon sure does toss a lot of weird stuff into his books.

There have been some extended interludes away from Slothrop, but there have only been brief returns to earlier characters like Pointsman and Prentice (look out, those P’s probably mean something, and the clue isn’t in the title this time around). I wonder where he’s going with them.

Brenschluss

Posted by David on May 15th, 2007

I have passed the halfway point. I’m on page 398, still in section 3, which has unfolded in a form more or less close to what I predicted. There are some additional conflicts emerging, and Slothrop is in a hell of a new bind, adding to the interest driving my motivation for finishing.

A couple of overachievers have finished the novel, so the contest aspect is essentially over. I guess we have to decide what to buy for Jared now. Finishing the book by the end of the month has been a sort of informal goal in this game, and, though I’m well behind several of the other readers, I’m still on track for that. One of the commenters says that Section 4 is a return to Section 1’s form, and, honestly, I eagerly await it. It’s nice to have some plot and a touch of clarity driving the novel, but the twistings of words into opaque tapestries in Section 1 where setting and character floated in and out of consciousness was such a unique drug. I want more.

GRDP: Day 11

Posted by David on May 11th, 2007

I’ve reached the end of section 2 on page 282. Pynchon has proven to me that even within the structure of a steadily-advancing plot, he can still write twisting, confusing, and sometimes absolutely disgusting prose. I have no idea what is going to happen in section 3. I doubt it will be a complete return to the form of section 1 and its mad, whirling style, but I expect there to be longer concentrations on other characters, and maybe even more long tangents to examine a different setting and subplot. But I don’t know. I’m over a third of the way through the book now. It’s been rough at some points, but I want to find out what happens next.

Day 8

Posted by David on May 8th, 2007

I’m on page 208. So far this second section has shifted from spastic examinations of an ever-growing menagerie of characters and their feelings and the world around them to concentrating only on the guy who I guess is the main character. Chris says that this section is more about plot, and I’m not sure what to think of that. Looking back, I really enjoyed the first section for what it was. I was able to get lost in the meandering tangents and sudden changes of perspective, and it was a hell of a ride through a bunch of confusing words. I liked it. I’m not sure yet what to make of this introduction of a story a quarter of the way in. I’ve realized that at this point that I really don’t care about Slothrop. I’m interested in what happens to him, but if he dies or fails or fades away, so it goes. I’m more interested in the motives and actions of the Pavlovian experimenter, and maybe that’ll come back to the surface. Recalling V. again, I felt the same lack of care for Profane, the schlemiel who hardly cared about himself, and Slothrop has some similar traits. I suppose that Pointsman could make a comeback much in the way that Stencil, whose eccentricities and interests eventually became the main thrust of V., did, but one of the things that kept that earlier novel interesting to me was how each chapter seemed to promise a new setting and new set of characters: maybe this one’s about a siege in Deutsch-Südwestafrika, or a poet writing about the war in Malta, or revolution in Florence—the story was composed of so many bizarre flashbacks that it was hard to keep up, and I liked that about it. This single plotline seems so mundane in comparison. The next set of boxes is about twenty pages off, so I’m going to call it quits for the night. I hope something changes soon.

And now I’m going to try writing about things that have nothing to do with Gravity’s Rainbow. I got free banananas today. I guess my food buying habits might seem a little weird. I don’t give one single damn whether the farmers I buy from sprayed their crops with DDT or Thalidomide or whatever. Whatever works, man; just so long as it tastes good when you’re done. I do, however, buy some items from the Publix semi-hippie label, Greenwise. The last meat I bought came from chickens that weren’t fed antibiotics or cow waste and went to good schools, and the milk, though not organic, comes from cows not treated with growth hormones. The label says right there that the FDA thinks I’m an idiot and the milk is exactly the same, but I know that the growth hormone creates a problem with udder infections, and that sounds super gross. Mainly I’m concerned about antibiotic abuse. That shit is bad news and we are all going to die of some invincible staph infection one of these days. I think I bought Greenwise tomato juice the last time I needed some, but there weren’t antibiotics involved in that decision; I think the organic stuff was just redder.

Anyhow, the news tells me that organic eating is old and busted, and the new hotness is local eating. I don’t shop at that little stand on Sandy Springs Circle out an effort to eat locally but more out of an effort to buy locally. Support local business and fight the man and all that. I like to know that the dude or lady I am giving my money to represents a small business that is able to keep its customers in sight rather than some huge corporation that is able to abstract customers into graphs and numbers. The health of small businesses seems to me to be in the best interest of the consumer, and I try to support that idea when possible. And sometimes I get free bananas. I don’t know where they came from: Florida or Costa Rica or somewhere. Who cares? Rick’s Farmers Market has a bunch of ripe bananas that need to move fast, and maybe all the sweating I do in a day really is causing a potassium deficiency.

Steve, of Steve, Don’t Eat It! fame, recently made a post about that honey thing that shows up on every box of honey-flavored breakfast cereal. I can understand its purpose—not all honey comes in a plastic bottle shaped liked a bear (my current batch, a sourwood honey from somewhere in the Blue Ridge mountains, came in a glass jar), and drizzling honey out of a jar requires some extra utensils—but I can fill that purpose with a spoon. I want to file this tool away in my mind with the melon ballers and cherry mashers of the world, but nothing so succinctly represents the presence of honey as that honey thing. It’s apparently called a honey dripper or honey dipper or something like that. I kind of want one. I wonder if there’s a Michael Graves version.

Sheldon Brown says I’ve been locking my bike all wrong. The best way is to put the lock around only the rear wheel, inside that rear diamond in the frame. The idea looks at how bicycles are stolen: bike locks are usually either chains or U-locks, so a thief is going to be carrying around either a pair of bolt cutters or a jack. Keeping the lock away from the frame will prevent frame damage during failed theft attempts, and it’s unlikely that a thief will try or succeed in cutting through the wheel. It doesn’t usually make much sense to carry a hacksaw around, and the tension on the rim makes it difficult to cut through. This new locking method makes sense, but it’s going to take a while to get used to. My rear wheel has a lot less clearance than the one pictured, and I’d have to rest the lock against the rear fender which has an annoying tendency to push the fender against the wheel. It still seems worth a shot.

I appear to be getting sunburned. I’ve been putting on SPF a billion sunscreen in the mornings, but I tend to forget to reapply in the afternoons. The EPA says that tomorrow’s UV index is 8, which is probably a lot. I don’t remember all of the details of those genealogy projects I did in school—I think my ancestors were mostly Micks and Dagos—but whatever set of DNA brought me here, I seem to burn pretty easily. I should probably do something about that.

I’m not sure how much longer these bananas are going to make it. Maybe I’ll try making bread out of them.

GRDP: Day 6

Posted by David on May 6th, 2007

I didn’t read at all on Saturday, so my progress slowed a bit. I’m now on page 156, and since the next row of boxes is about twenty pages away and I’m getting a headache, I’m calling it quits for the night.

One thing I noticed while flipping through future pages was a mostly blank page with a big number “2” and what looked like some kind of quote, like the one from Wernher Van Braun that began this crazy adventure. Looking back, that first page did have a big number “1” at the top as well as a title, “Beyond the Zero”. What the hell is this? Am I reaching the end of a 180-page chapter? Is this like the breaks between “books” in each volume of The Lord of the Rings?

V. is split up among sixteen chapters, and each one began with a short summary of the chapter’s contents that sometimes helps prepare the reader to understand what’s going on and sometimes doesn’t. The chapters are split into sections, each headed by a Roman numeral, that provide convenient resting points and are more or less replaced by the rows of boxes in Gravity’s Rainbow. Since I’ve gone a hundred and fifty freaking pages without a proper chapter break, I had since forgotten abouth that big number one at the beginning and just assumed the entire book was a single stream of violently meandering thoughts broken by the rows of boxes. What does that big number two mean? There can’t be much of a marked shift in setting or plot, since those shifts happen just as happily right in the middle of a paragraph. Will it be a shift in theme? A replacement of symbols? Is all of the time I spent trying to reconcile the Pavlovian, statistical and supernatural views as they apply to love and war going to be thrown out in another thirty pages? That big number terrifies me.

Gravity’s Rainbow: Day 3

Posted by David on May 3rd, 2007

I’m on page 94. Like Monday, other activities interfered, and I’m finishing short of my potential in order to succumb to the onslaught of night. Nothing really notable happened today. Yesterday I made it through the sequence around page seventy-something that started out with the letters, and man, that was weird. I stopped there for the night because after that assault of imagery, I couldn’t go any farther. The book is still interesting, but I’m beginning to suspect that I may have wandered through about a hundred pages of fancy nothing.

A screaming comes across the sky

Posted by David on May 2nd, 2007

What in the fuck did I just read?

I made it to page 30 in Gravity’s Rainbow. I’ve seen at least three different covers for paperback editions of this novel, and I don’t know if each is a sign of repagination. The one I have has a V-2 rocket outlined in white against something that looks like a black-and-white Pollock painting. I think I could make it a little farther, but I need to get some sleep tonight. This is certainly an odd book. I had to put it down for a little while after the sequence about a giant adenoid swallowing London (boring aside: my own adenoids were removed when I was like five. I don’t think they were the size of a city block.), but I picked it back up and continued on through a few more rows of boxes which I guess are chapter breaks.

I got a bit of a late start today since I decided to cook dinner instead of paying someone else to cook dinner for me, and that involved heating my kitchen up to approximately three billion degrees Fahrengrade and spending over an hour screwing around with some chicken, spinach and linguine. I also had a couple of drinks, fed my sourdough starter (it should be ready on Thursday), attempted to patch a bicycle tube (The patch didn’t take. I found the flat this morning (my favorite kind of flat, since fixing flats on the couch is a hell of a lot nicer than fixing them on a sidewalk), and investigation led to a tiny little hole that I thought was caused by grit caught inside the tire finally making its way into the tube. I cleaned out the tire, slapped on a new tube and forgot about it until tonight, but further investigation showed that the hole was actually on the corner of that weird rectangular seam that tubes from Performance seem to have. I think this is the last of my Performance tubes, and I swear I am never shopping at that shithole again. Seriously, why does a tube need an extra seam? I feel kind of bad now for telling that lady on MARTA that I got my bike at Performance, though I don’t think she’ll actually try to buy one. I’ve seen her before when I’ve gotten off at Dunwoody, and she’s very friendly and talkative, but there seems to be something a little off that I can quite put my finger on. I’ve always seen her wearing hospital scrubs and traveling with her nearly silent daughter. Maybe it’s just that quiet desperation shared by so many rider of public transit. Real nice lady, and I threw out that stupid tube after another spot on that goofy seam started blowing bubbles.) and watched an episode of House. I started my reading around 10 o’clock, and this book is kind of weird. It’s also very heavy. It’s hard to find a comfortable way to hold it.

Weekend assortment

Posted by David on Apr 29th, 2007

I’ve been baking a lot of bread lately. My first loaf was a disaster, but I think I’ve mastered the terrible secret and have been able to make some bread that was pretty alright. Baking bread has opened up some new problems. I needed a bread knife, of course, since it doesn’t come out of the oven sliced, and I needed to figure out where to get some yeast. Apparently it’s next to the flour in the store. It took me a while to figure that out. I figured it would be refrigerated, since it’s alive and all. I think my mom kept yeast in the fridge. That threw me off. I’d like to try a sourdough bread, though I’m not sure how I feel about letting things rot intentionally.

The bread is also exacerbating my problem of having too much homemade food around. I know I can freeze it, but I won’t; I don’t really want to go into it. I need to find a girlfriend to eat all the crap I cook. If any of you ladies out there like food, I’m available.

I bought my copy of Gravity’s Rainbow. It’s pretty thick. About this thick:

1.5 inches of postmodern fun

I’d like to think that I have some little bit of patience. I enjoy long movies. I even own copies of some bladder-busters like Lawrence of Arabia and Ben Hur. Sure, they have intermissions, and I can pause them, but they still constitute four-hour long thoughts that require a certain attention span in order to follow and appreciate them. I’ve read long collections of books, like Lord of the Rings and the Dune series, but the splits between those volumes seems to offer a sort of reprieve not available in single tomes. The longest single book I’ve ever read was actually V. 775 pages is a whole mess of pages. The great reading challenge starts on Tuesday.

My various attempts to read on the bus in the mornings have failed for a number of reasons, but I still try to get in some reading once in a while. Currently I’m working on Player Piano, Vonnegut’s first book, which I picked up after I heard of his death. I’ve read it before, and I figure that the day I can read that book without becoming totally depressed is the day I’ve completely stopped caring about humanity. It’s a pretty good book.

Apparently beets can make you piss red. I made some beet soup last night, and man, did I have a scare this morning.

I finally ditched that Peachtree Linux (popular in Scandinavia) thing and installed a Linux distribution that sees some maintenance once in a while. I installed Fedora core whatever’s latest, and it seems pretty alright. The music player is the main thing that’s been giving me trouble. I can’t seem to get tracks in playlists loaded in order even if the tracks have track number tags. I don’t get it, but I don’t care a whole lot, either.

I am in for a world of hurt

Posted by David on Apr 27th, 2007

Gravity’s Rainbow is novel by Thomas Pynchon that is widely held to be completely unreadable. Chris Lumens first introduced me to the idea of this novel, though this was not my first introduction to Pynchon. I’ll go more into that later. If I recall correctly, the Borders near Cumberland Mall didn’t even put Gravity’s Rainbow in the fiction section, instead banishing it to the dense mires of Philosophy. We joked about it sometimes, and sometimes expressed an interest in taking a shot at it, and when Chris moved to the frozen wastelands of New England, one of the parting gifts we gave him was a copy of Gravity’s Rainbow. We also included a cookbook with a Confederate flag on the cover, and I hope that he got more use out of that.

Chris has again brought forth the novel’s ugly head, this time in the form of a pact to try to read the thing. Like a sucker, I joined in.

Pynchon is considered part of the postmodern movement in literature. Postmodernism as a philosophy is a rejection of both rational and empirical knowledge in favor of a celebration of the banality of form as the expression of human existence. In other words, it’s complete bullshit. The pantheon of postmodern authors includes bullshit artists such as Joyce and Beckett, yet Pynchon stands apart from even these in the magnitude of his impenetrability. Chris posted a blogger’s review of Gravity’s Rainbow that seems to capture the attitude of anyone trying to read Pynchon’s works, and, though I’m too lazy to search for other reviews of this novel, for the sake of showing the parallels in attitude even among the literarily minded, I’m going to repeat a segment of a review of Pynchon’s last novel that I read in an actual newspaper (The Christian Science Monitor) while sitting on the crapper:

[Thomas Pynchon's] new novel, Against the Day, represents one of the few cases in which I’d recommend judging a book by its cover. A casual examination will reveal that (a) it’s massive (1,085 pages) and (b) if you stare at the blurry title for more than a second, it makes you feel dizzy and your head starts to hurt.

From the little I know of Pynchon’s works, that quote sums up the experience neatly. Gravity’s Rainbow is supposed to be his masterpiece of intertwined symbolism and confusing prose, and I can hardly wait for the start of this reading adventure. I’m going to pick up a copy tomorrow.

I’ve read V, Pynchon’s first novel, so I feel like I’ve had some training. I picked up a copy of V on the recommendation of Seth, one of dcantrell’s friends, after he asked me to use my university resources (which I didn’t need; I found it with Google) to retrieve a review of the novel written by George Plimpton for the New York Times Review of Books. The review was itself a beautiful creative work, describing a turbulent novel that, though perhaps flawed in its form of a series of seemingly disjoint stories, was reminiscent of the works of Kerouac and Heller and delightful in its encyclopedic volume of interconnected details and seemingly random bits of knowledge. I read the book itself fairly recently, and it was a pretty rough experience. Beyond the obvious obstacle of not having the requisite knowledge to fully appreciate the occasional passages written in French, German or Maltese, the disjoint nature of the novel made for a pretty confusing read. Overall, I’d say that V wasn’t bad and ultimately not very confusing—by the end of the novel, the most obvious of the symbols (everything that started with a “V”) were clearly explained into the plot (which became evident about halfway through) of the search for the mystery woman (though I’m not sure what she meant),—but what I’ll call the secondary symbols—the jeweled dentures, the jazz musician, the sexualized torture and death in Deutsch-Südwestafrika, the various attitudes of all of the other members of the Whole Sick Crew which the schlemiel, the ostensibly main character, became involved in—came and went rapidly, and the meaning of anything was always nearly opaque. V was basically a series of stories presented as a single piece that dared you to make sense of it in either context. I don’t know that I enjoyed it—the fact that I have to wonder suggests that I want to enjoy it more than I actually did—but it was in all a unique, and perhaps enlightening, experience.

From what I understand, V is Pynchon for beginners. Chris made it 60 pages into Gravity’s Rainbow, and I lack no faith in his persistence or tenacity in the face of something weird to be understood. This is going to be a hell of ride.